[2025:RJ-JP:2611] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 266/2025 Raju Meena @ Raju Langda S/o Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Kherli, Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.404/2024 registered at Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate. It is submitted that other co-accused person of this case has already been granted bail by the learned Trial Court. Petitioner is in custody since 22.10.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is a [2025:RJ-JP:2611] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-266/2025] habitual offender as ten other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially the fact that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate and charge-sheet has already been filed; as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Raju Meena @ Raju Langda S/o Kanhaiyalal, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The petitioner shall not repeat/involve similar offence during the currency of this bail. Breach of this condition would entail cancellation of this bail granted to him. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J DIVYA SAINI /269