Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2698 (HP)

PURSHOTAM RAM v. NEELAM KUMARI

CMP.M/2278/2025 · 2026-03-23

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Purshotam Ram Vs. Neelam Kumari CMP (M) No. 2278 of 2025 23.3.2026 Present: Mr.Pankaj Mehta, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr.Naresh Verma, Advocate, for the respondent. CMP (M) No. 2278 of 2025 There is delay of one day in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of one day in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of. FAO (FC) No. …… of 2026 (FAOST No. 62775 of 2025) Appeal be registered. Mr.Naresh Verma, Advocate waives service and accepts notice on behalf of respondent. Power of Attorney stands already filed. Records be requisitioned. List for consideration on 21st May, 2026. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 23rd March, 2026. (Keshav)