Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26978 (CHH)

RAVI KUMAR CHANDRAWANSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/908/2021 · 2025-01-28

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:4885 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 908 of 2021 1 - Ravi Kumar Chandrawanshi S/o Shree Hari Chandrawanshi, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Paraswara, Thana Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 2 - Dhiraj Singh Thakur S/o Shri Santosh Singh Thakur, Aged About 38 Years R/o H.No. 129, Ward No. 09, Pandariya, Thana Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 3 - Ashwani Kumar Yadu S/o Shri Shiv Kumar Yadu, Aged About 35 Years R/o 4/2 Jaitpuri, Patuwa, Sehmalgi, Thana Pandariya, Thana Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 4 - Chetan Verma S/o Shri Shri Sitaram Verma, Aged About 26 Years R/o House No. 114, Talabpara, Village Kusumghata, Tehsil Bodla, Labda, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 5 - Kewal Chandrawanshi S/o Shri Itwari Chandrawanshi, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village, Dalpurwa - Marka, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 6 - Ranjeet Verma S/o Shri Dhannu Ram Verma, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Sarangpur Kala, Baiharsari, Thana Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 7 - Mukesh Chandrakar S/o Shri Chinta Ram Chandrakar, Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Patuwa, Thana And Tehsil Pandariya District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 2 8 - Ashish Kumar Thakur S/o Shri Ben Lal Thakur, Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 414, Ward No. 20, Shanti Nagar, Village Virendra Nagar, Thana And Tehsil, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 9 - Ganesh Patre S/o Shri Ishwari Patre, Aged About 38 Years R/o Raghghupara, Thana And Tehsil Kabirdham District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, Police - Station - Kabirdham, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 2 - M.M. Dogre S/o (Late) Domaji Dogre Aged About 60 Years Sdo (Forest) R/o Office Of The Sub Division Officer (Forest), Kawarda, District Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. N. K. Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 28/01/2025 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner in repeated calls. Mr. N. K. Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer for the Respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "It is therefore most respectfully prayed, that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and further may kindly be pleased to quash 3 the impugned First Information Report/Crime no. 655/2021 dated 13.08.2021 and investigation thereof, registered against the present Petitioners and others at police-station Kabirdham, District Kabirdham CG for offences punishable under Section 147, 186, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3-1(s) of the Scheduled Caste/Schedulted Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the State, as per the information projected on the portal of District Court in the website with respect to the present case, submits that the petitioner has challenge the FIR in the present case whereas, after investigation charge-sheet has been filed and charges have been framed and further 4 prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the trial of the case is in progress. 4. None appears on behalf of the petitioners in repeated calls, it appears that for the aforesaid reasons, the petitioners have lost their interest in pursuing the present petition. 5. Considering the fact that the trial of the case is in progress and some of the witnesses are being examined and further no one appears on behalf of the petitioners to pursue the present petition. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.01.31 16:17:48 +0530