THE RENUKAJI DAM PROJECT AND ANOTHER v. KALYAN SINGH AND OTHERS
CMP/30171/2025 · 2026-05-04
Sushil Kukreja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2697 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2697 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Renukaji Dam Project & Anr. Vs. Kalyan Singh (deceased) through LRs & Ors. CMPs No. 30168 & 30171/2025 in RFA No. 137/2018 04.05.2026 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore and Mr. Digvinay Singh Kanwar, Advocates, for the non-applicants/appellants. Mr. Vaibhav Kanwar, Advocate, for proposed LRs No. 1(i) to 1(v) and respondents No. 2 to 12, 16, 17 & 19 to 21. Respondent No. 13 ex parte. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No. 23/State. CMP No. 30168/2025 The present application under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC has been filed by the applicants for their impleadment as respondents, being successors of deceased respondent No. 1. As per the applicants, respondent No. 1, Kalyan Singh has expired on 26.10.2023 and during his life time, he has executed a registered Will dated 17.11.2022, Deed No. 68/2022 in their favour. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants, death certificate of the deceased, legal heirs certificate as well as copy of Will. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants, the same is allowed and the applicants, being successors of deceased respondent No.
….2…. 1, are ordered to be impleaded as party in the present appeal and shall figure as respondent No. 1(a) and 1(b) in the array of respondents. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 30171/2025 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicants/respondents No. 1(a) & 1(b), for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants. No reply to the application has been filed and learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants submitted that he has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as the award has attained finality and no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of both the applicants, coupled with the fact that the award has attained finality, as till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this
….3….
Court, the same is allowed and the amount lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to- date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicants/respondents No. 1(a) & 1(b), as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been given in para-5 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 4th May, 2026 (raman)