IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 441 OF 2009 Appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment dated 29-09-2008 passed in O.S.No.163 of 2003 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. Between: 1. Pullela Gangarao, S/o.Lakshminarayanaraju, Hindu, aged about 40 years, Occu:Business, R/o.9-7-32, Perlavari Veedhi, Srikakulam. 2. Pullela Sitalakshmi (died), W/o.Lakshminarayanaraju, Hindu, aged about 60 years, Occu:Business, R/o.8-7-32, Perlavari Veedhi, Srikakulam. 3. Pullela Lakshminarayanaraju, S/o.Gangarao, Hindu, aged about 70 years, Occu:Business, R/o.8-7-32, Perlavari Veedhi, Srikakulam. ...Appellants/Defendants 1 to 3 AND 1. Shriram Chits Private Limited, Vizianagaram, Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Sri N.Ramu, S/o.Sanyasi Rao, Hindu, aged about 41 years. Divisional Manager. ...Respondent/Plaintiff 2. Pullela Ramakrishna, S/o.Lakshminarayanaraju, Hindu, aged about 42 years, Occu:Business, R/o.8-7-32, Perlavari Veedhi, Srikakulam. 3. Pullela Venkata Chalapathi, S/o.Lakshminarayanaraju, Hindu, aged years, Occu.Business, R/o.8-7-32, Perlavari Veedhi about 39 Srikakulam. (R2 and R3 not nacossary) ...Respondents/Defendants No.4 and 5 Counsel for the Appellants : Elevated as Judge Counsel for the Respondent No.I.Sri O.Udaya The Court made the following: kumar APHC010381972009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 441/2009 Between: Pullela Gangarao and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Shriram Chits P Ltd Vizianagaram and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.0 UDAYA KUMAR The Court made the following: / / /./ // ■ / THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT No.441 OF 2009 JUDGMENT: It appears that learned counsel for the appellants elevated as Hon’ble Judge, appellant Nos.1 and 3, the same have been returned unserved as ‘no such person’. No fresh vakalat filed in the place of earlier counsel. was Later, notice was taken to the 2. Sri O.Udaya Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.1 would submit that as per his instructions from the company, the matter was already been settled out of the Court and therefore, the appeal become infructuous. 3. Considering the above facts and circumstances, the appeal suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V. [^AKAR :gistrar DEPUTY, //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Division), Srikakulam, Srikakulam 1. The Principal Civil Judge (Senior District. (With records) rr^Diin CC to Smt B.V.Aparna Lakshmi, Advocate [OPUC] Onp CC to Sri O Udaya Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. 5. Two CD Copies 2. One BSV RAM \ HIGH COURT DATED: 17/06/2025 JUDGMENT AS.No.441 of 2009 i SEP 2025 Sectioftx^'' x> 3- 5o.y DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR non-prosecution without costs i