HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No.9900007/2011 in SWP No.607/2010 Atta Mohd. & Ors. ….Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through :- None. V/s State & Ors. ….Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Vivek Mattoo, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy.AG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 03.03.2025 01. Vide order dated 22.03.2010, SWP No.607/2010 came to be disposed of by this Court at the threshold with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners (Annexure-‘C’ to the petition) and take a decision thereon in terms of the rules occupying the field within a period of three months from the date copy of the said order is made available to them. 02. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the claim of the writ petitioners was considered by the respondents and petitioners No.1, 2, 3, 4, 7 & 8 who were eligible for promotion were confirmed as Laboratory Assistants, whereas claim of petitioners No.5 & 6 came to be declined due to non-availability of eligibility criteria of seniority and that petitioner No.6 was found to be involved in some unlawful activities. Sr. No.39 2 03. In view of the above, since order dated 22.03.2010 stands complied, the present contempt petition does not survive and is dismissed as such. 04. Disposed of. (Rajesh Sekhri) Judge JAMMU 03.03.2025 Eva