Banka Suresh Babu Yadav, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/423/2025 · 2025-01-07
V Sujatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2696 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2696 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010007072025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 423/2025 Between: Banka Suresh Babu Yadav, and another ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:
2
ORDER : This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“.... to issue a Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in issuing the Confirmation Order under section 452(2) and 461(2) of APMC Act, 1955 and under Section 86, 89(3) of APMR and UDA Act, 2016 vide Notice No.179/1031/NLR/UC/2024 date 02.01.2025 in continuation of the earlier Provisional Orders issued under Section 452(1) and 461(2) of MC Act, 1955 and as per Section 86, 89(1 and 2), 90(1) of APMR and UDA Act, 2016 vide Notice No.179/1031/NLR/UC/2024 dated 19.12.2024 to the Petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the Principles of Natural Justice apart from Contravention of G.O.Ms.No.128 (Municipal Administration and Urban Development(MI) Department dated 22.05.2015 and The Andhra Pradesh Regulation and Penalization of Buildings constructed unauthorizedly and in deviation of the Sanctioned Plan Rules, 2015 and Consequently set aside the impugned Confirmation Order under section 452(2) and 461(2) of APMC Act, 1955 and under Section 86, 89(3) of APMR and UDA Act, 2016 vide Notice No.179/1031/NLR/UC/2024 dated 02.01.2025 in continuation of the earlier Provisional Orders issued under Section 452(1) and 461(2) of MC Act, 1955 and as per Section 86, 89(1 and 2), 90(1) of APMR and UDA Act, 2016 vide Notice No.179/1031 /NLR/UC/2024 dated 19.12.2024…...”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for respondent No.1, Mr.A.S.C.Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporation for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the
order, dated 13.03.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6321 of 2024 and requested to pass a similar order in this Writ Petition also. The same is not
3
disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The operative portion of the said order, reads as under:
10. In view of the discussion supra, the confirmation order dated 06.02.2024 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the authorities. The learned Commissioner/concerned authority shall provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner shall co-operate for enquiry. The Commissioner/concerned authority shall pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks and communicate the same to the petitioner. Till such time, the respondent authorities shall not take any coercive steps with regard to the subject property. The petitioner also shall not make any further constructions, till an order is passed by the authority.
4. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition is also disposed of, in terms of the order, dated 13.03.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6321 of 2024.
5. Accordingly, the confirmation order dated 02.01.2025 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the authorities. The learned Commissioner/concerned authority shall provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The petitioners shall co-operate for enquiry. The Commissioner/concerned authority shall pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks and communicate the same to the petitioners. Till such time, the respondent authorities shall not take any coercive steps with regard to the subject property. The petitioners also shall not make any further constructions, till an order is passed by the authority.
4
6. Registry is directed to attach the copy of the order, dated 13.03.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6321 of 2024 to this order. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 07.01.2025 KGR