BREEZE KISHORE KUMAR v. JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPC/5441/2018 · 2025-09-23
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26959 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26959 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:29480 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S). No. 5441 of 2018
With I.A. No. 3420 of 2025 -------
1. Breeze Kishore Kumar, son of: Jhakhuri Shah, aged about 59 years, resident of: Singh More, Latma, Road No. 9, Vikash Nagar, P.O. Hatia, Near Swarnanand Apartment, Badle More, P.S. Jagarnathpur Town, District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand.
2. Samar Kumar Gupta, son of: Late Chittaranjan Gupta, aged about 50 years, resident of R-25/5 Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Argora Town, District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand.
3. Brajnath Roy, son of Late Siyaram Roy, aged about 59 years, resident of: L.I.G. R-70, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Argora Town: District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand.
4. Shankar Gope, Son of: Late Sukra Gope, aged about 50 years, resident of L.I.G. R/68, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Argora Town: District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand. ….... Petitioners. VERSUS
1. Jharkhand State Housing Board through its Managing Director having its Office at: Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Argora Town, District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand.
2. The Managing Director, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Argora Town, District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand.
3. Secretary, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Argora Town District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand.
4. Accountants Officer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. Harmu, P.S. Argora Town, District: Ranchi, State: Jharkhand. …….. Respondents
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ravi Prakash Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondents : Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate
---- 10/ 23.09.2025 I.A. No. 3420 of 2025 has been preferred by the petitioners seeking permission to withdraw the instant writ application as grievances of the petitioners have been redressed.
2. Looking to the averments made in this interlocutory application, the same is allowed. Consequently, the instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
23rd September, 2025
Kunal