- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22316 CRL.RP No. 185 of 2019 C/W CRL.RP No. 184 of 2019 CRL.RP No. 186 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 185 OF 2019 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 184 OF 2019 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 186 OF 2019 IN CRL.RP No. 185/2019 BETWEEN: 1. KANTHI SHETTY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS MANAGING DIRECTOR AIRCOM SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. No.37/2, CHICAGO AVENUE CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 52. 2. M/s. AIRCOM SOLUTIONS P. LTD. No.37/2, CHICAGO AVENUE CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 52. REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR KANTHI SHETTY. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI KARUMBAIAH T A, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22316 CRL.RP No. 185 of 2019 C/W CRL.RP No. 184 of 2019 CRL.RP No. 186 of 2019 AND: CHIKKAMUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA CIVIL CONTRACTOR R/AT No.11, MARUTHI FARM HOSUR, AMRUTHANAGAR BANGALORE – 92. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI S DORAI BABU, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.08.2018 PASSED BY THE LXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY (CCH-69) IN CRL.A.No.1075/2016 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 18.08.2016 PASSED BY THE XVIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.No.22584/2015 AND ACQUIT THE ACCUSED AND ETC., IN CRL.RP No. 184/2019 BETWEEN: 1. KANTHI SHETTY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS MANAGING DIRECTOR AIRCOM SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. No.37/2, CHICAGO AVENUE CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 52. 2. M/s. AIRCOM SOLUTIONS P. LTD. No.37/2, CHICAGO AVENUE CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 52. REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR KANTHI SHETTY. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI KARUMBAIAH T A, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22316 CRL.RP No. 185 of 2019 C/W CRL.RP No. 184 of 2019 CRL.RP No. 186 of 2019 AND: CHIKKAMUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA CIVIL CONTRACTOR R/AT No.11, MARUTHI FARM HOSUR, AMRUTHANAGAR BANGALORE – 92. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI S DORAI BABU, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.08.2018 PASSED BY THE LXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN CRL.A.No.1074/2016 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 18.08.2016 PASSED BY THE XVIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.No.22583/2015 AND ACQUIT THE ACCUSED AND ETC., IN CRL.RP No. 186/2019 BETWEEN: 1. KANTHI SHETTY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS MANAGING DIRECTOR AIRCOM SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. No.37/2, CHICAGO AVENUE CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 52. 2. M/s. AIRCOM SOLUTIONS P. LTD. No.37/2, CHICAGO AVENUE CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE – 52. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22316 CRL.RP No. 185 of 2019 C/W CRL.RP No. 184 of 2019 CRL.RP No. 186 of 2019 REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR KANTHI SHETTY. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI KARUMBAIAH T A, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: CHIKKAMUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA CIVIL CONTRACTOR R/AT No.11, MARUTHI FARM HOSUR, AMRUTHANAGAR BANGALORE – 92. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI S DORAI BABU, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.08.2018 PASSED BY THE LXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN CRL.A.No.1076/2016 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 18.08.2016 PASSED BY THE XVIII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.No.22585/2015 AND ACQUIT THE ACCUSED AND ETC., THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22316 CRL.RP No. 185 of 2019 C/W CRL.RP No. 184 of 2019 CRL.RP No. 186 of 2019 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner was also absent on 10.06.2025. On 10.06.2025 this Court has passed the following order ; “Learned counsel for respondent present. Learned counsel for petitioners absent. The matters are of the year 2019. There are no grounds for adjournment. However, in order to give one more opportunity, the matters are being adjourned as last chance. List on 25.06.2025.” 4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter. 5. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66