Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26942 (GAU)

SANJAY DEY ALIAS SAJU v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2675/2025 · 2025-11-18

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010247822025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2675/2025 SANJAY DEY ALIAS SAJU S/O SADHAN CHANDRA DEY, R/O BANAMALI ROAD, WARD NO.13 BANAMALI PART - I, P.S. KARIMGANJ SRIBHUMI DISTRICT SRIBHUMI, ASSAM. PIN CODE 788 710 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP, BY THE PP,ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. RAJARSHEE DE, MR. F A HASSAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 19.11.2025 Heard Mr. R. De, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. S. H. Bora, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This petition under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is filed for granting bail to the petitioners, namely, Sanjay Dey @ Saju, in connection with Karimganj P.S. Case No. 451/2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 1392/2025 under Sections 281/324(4)/125(b)/109/117(2)/304(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. The allegations as per the FIR is that the present accused Nos. 1 & 2 was named in the FIR were driving a car and hit an auto rickshaw and the bike and Page No.# 2/2 thereafter, hit the informant at high speed causing injury to him. Thereafter, they the accused persons were chased and intercepted and after such interception the accused persons assaulted the informant causing him multiple injuries. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the present petitioner was not even in the offending vehicle and was a by stander. 5. The learned Addl. P.P., on perusal of the injury report submits that the injuries on the informant and others were found to be simple in nature. 6. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail pre-arrest bail is allowed. 7. It is directed that in the event of arrest in connection with this case, the accused-petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. 8. It is further provided that the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. and he shall not try to intimidate or witnesses in any manner. 9. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of. 10. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant