Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26939 (KAR)

SRI SRINIVASA K N v. SRI PRAVEEN P BAGEWADI

CCC/598/2024 · 2025-01-08

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:556-DB CCC No. 598 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CCC NO. 598 OF 2024 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SRINIVASA K.N., S/O. K. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS WORING AS SECOND DIVISION ASSISTANT CUM COMPUTER OPERATOR KITTURU RANI CHENNAMMA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL VENAKTAURA VILLAGE BAGEPALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 563 124 …COMPLAINANT (BY SMT. SHILPA RANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI PRAVEEN P. BAGEWADI AGE MAJOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY KARANTAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BOARD BUILDING Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:556-DB CCC No. 598 of 2024 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR NEAR CHANDRIKA HOTEL CUNNINGAM ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 …ACCUSED 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRSENTED BY SECRETARY ...PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY MS. AISWARYA CHANDAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI SHRIDHAR PRABHU, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED OR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE DIRECTIONS PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.8591/2022 INTERIM ORDER DATED 21.04.2022 AND ORDER DATED 21.02.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B, PUNISH HIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:556-DB CCC No. 598 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Ms. Aiswarya Chandran for learned advocate Mr. Shridhar Prabhu for respondent No.1 stated that the order under contempt is complied with. This statement of fact could not be disputed by learned advocate Smt. Shilpa Rani for the complainant. In the aforesaid view, nothing survives in the present contempt proceedings. The contempt petition is dismissed as not surviving. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47