Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:24306
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4566 of 2025 1 - Umesh Prasad S/o. Shri Mohar Sai Aged About 35 Years Working As Lecturer (Chemistry), Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Sanawal, Block - Ramchandrapur, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.)
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahandadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Public Instruction Directorate First Floor, C-Block, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Block- Ramchandrapur, District - Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - The Secretary Rationalization Committee Cum District Education Officer, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) WPS No. 4723 of 2025 1 - Kornelius Kujur W/o Shri Siril Kujur Aged About 46 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb), At Primary School Rajwadhondi, Block Shankargarh District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.)
---Petitioner(s) ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.06.17 10:52:12 +0530
2 Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Public Instruction Directorate First Floor, C-Block, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Block Shankargarh, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - The Secretary Rationalization Committee Cum District Education Officer, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 7 - Bhinsu Kujur Working As- Assistant Teacher, At Primary School Rajwadhondi, Block Shankargarh District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.)
--- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board 16-06-2025
1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioners have declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents are against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and if the petitioners are not granted interim relief, they will suffer
3 with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.
3.
Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioners have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. He would further submit that if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on their representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents.
5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today, and appear before the said Committee on 20th June, 2025. Thereafter, the Committee shall decide the representation of the petitioners within seven days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law in objective manner. Till decision on the representation is communicated to the petitioners, the impugned transfer order issued under Teacher Rationalization Instructions, so far as the petitioners are concerned, be kept in abeyance.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stands disposed of.
Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal)
Judge Alok