APHC010381632011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13083/2011 Between: 1. P.V. BALAJI DEEKSHITHULU, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O. P. SEETHARAMACHARYULU, PUBLIC RELATION OFFICER S.V. BHAKTI CHANNEL, TTDS, TIRUPATI, R/O. TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VENKATESWARA BHAKTHI CHANNEL TTD TIRUPATI 2OTRS, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/ EXECUTIVE OFFICER TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TTDS, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, SRI VENKATESWARA BHAKTHI CHANNEL TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, ALIPIRI, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SRI R RAMANUJAM, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER SRI VENKATESWARA BHAKTHI CHANNEL, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, ALIPIRI, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the issuance of Proceedings No: SVBC/04/COO/2011, dt. 11-04-2011 from the file of the 2nd respondent and after perusing the same, quash the said proceedings dt. 11-04-2011 by declaring it as arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice and contrary to law and consequently direct the Respondents to continue the Petitioner in service as Public Relations Officer in the 1st Respondent, and also to extend all other benefits, monetary or otherwise, on par with similarly situated employees appointed along with the Petitioner and with all other consequential benefits. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 15892 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the operation of the impugned Proceedings No: SVBC/04/COO/2011, dt. 11-04-2011 issued by the 1st Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP 20225 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to re-call the order dt. 29.4.2011 in WPMP No. 15892 of 2011 in WP No. 13083 of 2011 and restore the same on file. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C H MURALI KRISHNA 2. --. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 13083 of 2011 ORDER: Heard Sri Naga Praveen Vankayalapati, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.Sumanth, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition and endorsed the same on the bundle. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.13083 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP