Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[209]
Karamjit Singh
Amrit Nagpal and others
Coram :
Present:
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
[1] of the appellants. Same was the situation appellants are not interested in pursuing the instant appeal. [2] there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today.
26.09.2025 ‘R. Sharma'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-347 Date of Decision :
Karamjit Singh
versus Amrit Nagpal and others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
None.
****
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
Despite case being called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellants. Same was the situation appellants are not interested in pursuing the instant appeal.
In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today.
26.09.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 347-2002 Date of Decision : 26.09.2025
…Appellant
….Respondents JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
e case being called twice, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellants. Same was the situation on the last date. It seems that appellants are not interested in pursuing the instant appeal. In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
JUDGE
: Yes/No : Yes/No
e case being called twice, no one has appeared on behalf date. It seems that In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any ) RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.09.26 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document