Page No.# 1/7 GAHC040019052025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/283/2025 Pemba Sona Son of Shri Karma Sona, a permanent residence of Yorni Village, PO and PS Mechuka, District Shi Yomi, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 9 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Additional Deputy Commissioner cum Executive Magistrate Age: 0 Occupation : Mechuka PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 3:Dawa Norbu Sera Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Sange Sona residence of Yorni Village PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 4:Lhakpa Chukla Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Thinley Chukla residence of Village Singbir PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh Page No.# 2/7 5:Tashi Tsering Sona Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Pemba Tsering Sona residence of Singbir Village PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 6:Yeshir Chukla Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Dawa Chukla residence of Village Sorang Dem PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 7:Shri Pema Norbu Sone Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Dawa Tsering Sona residence of Yorni PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 8:Tenjen Chukla Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Singtung Chukla residence of Yorni PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 9:Ngonden Sona Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Pema Norbu Sona residence of Yorni PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 10:Dorjee Khandu Chukla Age: 0 Page No.# 3/7 Occupation : Son of Tsering Chukla residence of Mechuka PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Prades Advocate for the Petitioner : Eddie Payeng, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Linked Case : WP(C)/121/2024 Pemba Sona Age: 40 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Karma Sona a permanent residence of Yorni Village PO and PS Mechuka District Shi Yomi Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 9 Ors Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the Chief Secretary Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 2:The Additional Deputy Commissioner cum Executive Magistrate Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Mechuka PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 3:Dawa Norbu Sona Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Sange Sona residence of Yorni Village Page No.# 4/7 PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 4:Lhakpa Chukla Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Thinley Chukla residence of Village Singbir PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 5:Tashi Tsering Sona Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Pemba Tsering Sona residence of Singbir Village PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 6:Yeshir Chukla Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Dawa Chukla residence of Village Sorang Dem PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 7:Pema Norbu Sona Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Dawa Tsering Sona residence of Yorni PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 8:Tenjen Chukla Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Singtung Chukla residence of Yorni PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh Page No.# 5/7 9:Ngonden Sona Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Pema Norbu Sona residence of Yorni PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh 10:Dorjee Khandu Chukla Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Tsering Chukla residence of Mechuka PO and PS Mechuka Shi Yomi District Arunachal Pradesh ------------ Advocate for : Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The State of AP and 9 Ors: Advocate , , , , , , , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, Page No.# 6/7 8, 9, 10, respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 29-01-2026 Heard Mr. E. Payeng, learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner. Also heard Ms G. Ete, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for the State respondents No.1 and 2 and Mr. K. Loya, learned counsel for the private respondents No.3 to 10. 2. At this stage, Mr. E. Payeng, learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner prays for allowing him to withdraw this application along with the writ petition with a liberty to file appropriate application/appeal before the appropriate forum. 3. The prayer so made by the learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner is not being objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. 4. Accordingly, prayer for withdrawal of the interlocutory application as well as writ petition is allowed with a liberty as prayed for. 5. In view of the above, both the interlocutory application as well as writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Page No.# 7/7 JUDGE Comparing Assistant