Dondapati Srinivasa Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/19918/2025 · 2025-09-02
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26923 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26923 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010381452025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 19918/2025 Between:
1. DONDAPATI SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. FIAT NO. 101 B-BLOCK, YAGANTI AIRNOND VYALI SRIRAM NAGAR, 7TH LANE, INNAR RING ROAD, GORANTIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. 3. SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MOOLAPET, NELLORE DISTRICT
4. EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, MOOLAPET, NELLORE DISTRICT,
5. SRINIVASA RAO, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, MOOLAPET, NELLORE DISTRICT,
6. M MURALI, S/O GAJAPATI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.1-111, THORURU VILLAGE, H/O RACHAPALEM, PUTTURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the 4th respondent in not rectifying the receipt by mutate the petitioner name by delete the 6th respondent's name in auction receipt is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondent to mutate the petitioner name instead of the 6th respondent's name in auction receipt, IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased forthwith direct the 3rd and 4th respondent did not take any coercive steps pertaining to auction properties, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KRANTHI KUMAR PASUMARTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 19918/2025 Order: -
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 03.09.2025 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
47
WRIT PETITION NO: 19918/2025
Date:03.09.2025 Dvs