NASIRUDDIN MONDAL RAJ ALIAS NASIR UDDIN MONDAL v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/2777/2025 · 2025-12-10
Pranjal Das
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26922 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26922 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010256212025
2025:GAU-AS:17181
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2777/2025 NASIRUDDIN MONDAL RAJ ALIAS NASIR UDDIN MONDAL SO SIRAJUL ISLAM MONDAL, PERMANENT ADDRESS RO VILL KALAIR ALGA PT I, PO KOKRADANGA, PS SUKCHAR, DIST SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILL BHALUKDUBI,PO AND PS BALIGAON, DIST GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN 783101 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A H AHMED, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
:: BEFORE ::
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
O R D E R 11.12.2025
Heard Mr. A.H. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. I have
Page No.# 2/2 also heard Mr. K.K. Das, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam.
2. This is the second application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, whereby the petitioner, namely- Nasiruddin Mondal (Raj) @ Nasir Uddin Mondal has prayed for anticipatory bail in respect of Numaligarh Rural P.S. Case No.72/2025, registered under Sections 61(2)/308(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The updated Case Diary has been received. Relevant portion of the same is perused.
4. Earlier anticipatory bail application being A.B. No.2274/2025 was rejected by this Court.
5. As per the allegation in the FIR, the accused is stated to have blackmailed the victim and extorted money from her. The alleged conduct of the petitioner is also finds support from the investigation.
6. The investigation is still in progress. The updated materials disclose that the petitioner illegally possessed the obscene/vulnerable photographs of the victim and later on made them viral.
7. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant him the privilege of anticipatory bail.
8. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands rejected at this stage. Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant