Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26912 (KAR)

M/S RELIANCE CAPITAL COMMERCIAL v. MR VINAY T M

WP/14854/2022 · 2025-01-15

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1434 WP No. 14854 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 14854 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S RELIANCE CAPITAL COMMERCIAL AND HOME FINANCE LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER MR RAMESH NO.39, FFK TOWERS 2ND FLOOR TILAK NAGAR, BANNERGHATTA ROAD BANGALORE-5600279 REG. U/S 23/1 OF COMPANIES ACT 1956. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANANPATHY KUPPUSWAMY., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. ASHA NANDI M S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR VINAY T M S/O DR MUDDUKRISHNA BESIDE GRR PETROLEUM, SIRA ROAD TAMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR-572101. 2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AUDIT)-1 COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VANIJYA TERIGE SANKEERNA LGSTO-175 1ST FLOOR, SIDDARAMESHWARA EXTN JAYANAGARA EAST, TUMKUR-572103. Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1434 WP No. 14854 of 2022 3. THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE TUMKUR-572103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BHANU PRAKASH H V., ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH., AGA FOR R2 7 R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYINTG TO QUASH THE ATTACHMENT ORDER NO.CTO(A)-1/TMK/T/NO.20/2020-21 DTD.23.4.2020 AT ANNEXURE-F ON THE FILE OF THE R-2 AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE R-3 TO REMOVE THE ENTRY OF ATTACHMENT OF THE PROEPRTY GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE ORDER OF ATTACHMENT ORDER NO.CTO (A)- 1/TMK/T/NO.20/2020-21 DTD.23.4.2020 AT ANNEXURE-F ON THE FILE OF THE R-2 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 10.01.2025 stating that the 1st respondent has settled the dues under One Time Settlement Scheme and therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1434 WP No. 14854 of 2022 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL