YOGRAJ SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. THE DC MANDI AND OTHERS
CWP/15666/2025 · 2025-09-26
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26911 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26911 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:33745 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 15666 of 2025 Decided on : 26.09.2025 Sh. Yograj Sharma and another …Petitioners Versus Deputy Commissioner, Mandi and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : M/s Amit Kumar Dhumal and Parul Negi, Advocates. For the respondent : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate
General,
for respondents No.1 to 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice confined to respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of said respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have filed a representation (Anneuxre P-7) to the Authority concerned and it would be in the interest of justice, in case, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:33745 Authority shall take an appropriate decision thereupon, within some time bound manner.
3. Without going into the merits of the case, in light of the innocuous prayer made by the petitioners, this petition is
disposed of with the direction that let representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-7) be decided by the Authority, within a period of six weeks from today, by adhering to the principles of natural justice and by listening to all the stake holders. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
September 26, 2025
(Shivank Thakur)