[2025:RJ-JP:33058] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10010/2025 Anil Kumar S/o Late Shri Sukhdev Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 24, Chirawa, Police Station Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (At Present Accused In Central Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.65/2025 registered at Police Station Bagar, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 307, 324(2), 351(2) & 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 307, 124(1), 110, 331(6), 61(2), 191(2) & 191(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that as per the statement recorded during the course of investigation, main [2025:RJ-JP:33058] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10010/2025] allegation of pouring hot milk on the injured is against the co- accused but according to the medical report, six injuries were found on the person of the injured which were opined as simple in nature and caused by blunt weapon. Counsel submits that co- accused persons namely- Praveen Kumar, Surendra Kumar, Dalip Kumar, Dharmendra Kumar and Sonu have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He submits that three other cases have been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, as also the fact that co-accused persons namely- Praveen Kumar, Surendra Kumar, Dalip Kumar, Dharmendra Kumar & Sonu have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Anil Kumar S/o Late Shri Sukhdev [2025:RJ-JP:33058] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10010/2025] Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /200