Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010260402025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3871/2025 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT RAMON HOUSE, H.T. PAREKH MARG, 169, BACKBAY RECLAMATION, MUMBAI 400020 AND ITS GUWAHATI BRANCH OFFICE AT ADITYAM BUILDING, 6TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR, GS ROAD, GUWAHATI, ASSAM. PIN781007.. VERSUS SMTI SUMATI CHOUDHARY AND ANR. W/O SRI MADAN CHOUDHARY, R/O VILLAGE-SUKANJANI, P.O AND P.S- SARBHOG, DISTRICT-BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781317. PRESENT ADDRESS- R/O VILLAGE- SIDALCHUTI, P.S- SIDALCHUTI ,DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-783383 CLAIMANT 2:M/S PAWAN COMMUNICATION 3RD FLOOR ROYAL ARCADE BUILDING B.BARUA ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI DIST-KAMRUPM ASSAM PIN-781007 OWNER OF THE VEHICLE NO. AS-25-AC-606 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M SAIKIA, MS. P BORTHAKUR,MR. R GOSWAMI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A HUSSAIN (R-1), Linked Case : MFA./12584/2025 (Filing Number) HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT RAMON HOUSE H.T. PAREKH MARG Page No.# 2/3 169 BACKBAY RECLAMATION MUMBAI 400020 AND ITS GUWAHATI BRANCH OFFICE AT ADITYAM BUILDING 6TH FLOOR LACHIT NAGAR GS ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM. PIN-781007 VERSUS SMTI SUMATI CHOUDHARY W/O SRI MADAN CHOUDHARY R/O VILLAGE-SUKANJANI P.O AND P.S- SARBHOG DISTRICT-BARPETAASSAM PIN-781317 PRESENT ADDRESS R/O VILLAGE-SIDALCHUTI P.S- SIDALCHUTI DIST-BONGAIGAONASSAM PIN-783383 ....CLAIMANT 2:MS PAWAN COMMUNICATION 3RD FLOOR ROYAL ARCADE BUILDING B.BARUA ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI DIST-KAMRUPMASSAM PIN-781007 OWNER OF THE VEHICLE NO. AS-25-AC-6066 RESPONDENTS ------------ Advocate for : MONDAKINI SAIKIA Advocate for : appearing for SMTI SUMATI CHOUDHARY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 03.12.2025 Heard Ms. P. Borthakur, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 54 days of delay in filing the connected Miscellaneous First Appeal. 3. This Court has gone through the application and found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. 4. Going for issuing notice to the respondents would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Page No.# 3/3 5. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. 6. The connected Miscellaneous First Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant