2025:HHC:1096 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1282 of 2024 Date of Decision: 06.01.2025 _______________________________________________________ M/s Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Richa Sethi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, & Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents to implement/ execute the judgment dated 11.03.2024 passed by this Court in CWP No.6787 of 2021, titled as M/s Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Vs. State of HP. 2. Careful perusal of aforesaid judgment, sought to be executed in the present proceedings, reveals that this Court, while disposing of the writ petition, directed the respondents that petitioner shall not be forced to pay the stamp duty for the transfer of the Unit in issue. Since, despite there being specific direction to do the needful, as taken note herein above, respondents failed to comply with the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:1096 judgment, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 3. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid orders, sought to be executed, must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of three weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of the afore undertaking given by learned Additional Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful, positively within a period of three weeks from today, if not already done, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge January 06, 2025 (sunil)