Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26903 (GAU)

BIJOY TAYE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/5933/2022 · 2025-11-30

Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010182812022 2025:GAU-AS:16444 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5933/2022 BIJOY TAYE S/O- LATE JATIN TAYE, VILL. AND P.O.- KULAJAN, P.S.- SILAPATHAR, DIST. DHEMAJI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, SOIL CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE DIRECTOR OF SOIL CONSERVATION ASSAM BHUMI SANGRAKSAN BHAWAN R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE DIVISIONAL OFFICER DHEMAJI JONAI SOIL CONSERVATION DIVISION SILAPATHAR P.O. SILAPATHAR DIST. DHEMAJI PIN- 787059. 4:THE RANGE OFFICER SILAPATHAR SOIL CONSERVATION DIVISION SILAPATHAR P.O.- SILAPATHAR DIST. DHEMAJI Page No.# 2/2 PIN- 787059 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D BHUYAN, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 01.12.2025 Heard Mr D Bhuyan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr G Bokolial, learned Government Advocate, Assam, appearing on behalf of the State respondents. 2. Mr D Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for has already been granted by the respondent authorities and nothing remains for further adjudication in this matter. 3. Accordingly, this matter is closed, as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant