Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31997] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10004/2025
1. Bhagwan Sahai S/o Ramkishor, Aged About 34 Years,
2. Ramphool S/o Ramkishor, Aged About 41 Years, Both R/o Golada, Police Station Baijupada, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Kolana, Bandikui, Dausa). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Meghraj Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP and Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Saini, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 14/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.203/2024 registered at Police Station Baijupada, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74 & 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that co-accused person of this case namely Jagdish @ Bhumiya has been granted benefit of bail by the Hon’ble Apex Court. He argues that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:31997] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10004/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also considering the fact that aforementioned co-accused person has been granted benefit of bail by the Hon’ble Apex Court and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Bhagwan Sahai S/o Ramkishor, and 2.
Ramphool S/o Ramkishor shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-311