Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010255962025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2756/2025 ANKUR PAUL AND ANR S/O- LT. NARAYAN PAUL, R/O- MALUGRAM DIVERSION ROAD, P.S.
SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN- 788001 2: DEEPA PAUL W/O- ANKUR PAUL R/O- MALUGRAM DIVERSION ROAD P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 78800 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY P.P., ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A Z AHMED, MR. M HOQUE Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
ORDER 20.11.2025
Heard Mr. A. Z. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Page No.# 2/3
2. This petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners, namely, Ankur Paul and Deepa Paul, have prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with PR Case No. 1495/2025 arising out of Silchar PS Case No. 499/2025, registered under Section 329(4)/296/74/76/117(2) /351(2)/3(5)of BNS, 2023 which after completion of investigation was charge-sheeted against both the accused petitioners vide CS No. 361/2025 dated 30.05.2025 under Sections 329(4)/296/74/76/117(2)/351(2) /3(5) BNS.
3. Certified copy of the charge-sheet has been annexed and I have perused the same. Corresponding to the police case, PRC Case No. 1495/2025 was registered and the same is pending before the learned JMFC, Silchar at the stage of appearance and the learned Magistrate was pleased to issue BWA of Rs.1000/- each against the petitioners.
4. It is also submitted that out of the charge-sheeted Sections, except Section 76 (corresponding to Section 354 IPC earlier) the other penal provisions are Magistrate triable.
5. However, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. K. Baishya in the given
facts and circumstances and considering the fact that the case is at the stage of trial, after completion of investigations - custodial detention of the accused may not be necessary and further, on the basis of the materials available, I find it possible to dispose of the matter.
6. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, named above, in connection with above mentioned case, they shall be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- each with a suitable surety each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting authority.
Page No.# 3/3 The direction for pre-arrest bail is subject to the conditions that the petitioners: (a) Shall co-operate with the remaining investigation; (b) Shall not intimate or harass the informant and his family member. (c) Shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence of the case.
7. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands allowed and
disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant