[2025:RJ-JP:30858] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10009/2025 1. Udaisingh S/o Balveer, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Uwar P.s. Kumher District Deeg, Rajasthan (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg (Bharatpur). 2. Dharajeet S/o Raghuveer Singh, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Uwar P.s. Kumher District Deeg, Rajasthan (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg (Bharatpur). 3. Kanha S/o Udaisingh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Uwar P.s. Kumher District Deeg, Rajasthan (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg (Bharatpur). 4. Sachin S/o Vikram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Uwar P.s. Kumher District Deeg, Rajasthan (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg (Bharatpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Singh Bikarwar For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Arvind Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 350/2025 registered at Police Station Kumher, District Deeg (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 125, 333, 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:30858] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10009/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submit that none of the injuries sustained to the injured persons are opined as dangerous to life. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since 27.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that cross-cases have been registered between the parties; nature of injuries; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -(1) Udaisingh S/o Balveer, (2) Dharajeet S/o Raghuveer Singh, (3) Kanha S/o Udaisingh & (4) Sachin S/o Vikram shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to [2025:RJ-JP:30858] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10009/2025] the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN/359