Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010223342025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/2320/2025 KHATANGPANI TEA ESTATE BURIDIHING KHATANGPANI P.S. AND P.O.- PENGAREE DISTRICT- TINSUKIA SUB-DIVISIONMARGHERITA PIN - 786176 ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS CO-OWNERS SRI VIKRAM SARMA 2: SRI VIKRAM SARMA SON OF LATE BALINDRA NATH SARMA RESIDENT OF 39B PURNA DAS ROAD P.O.- SARAT BOSE ROAD P.S.- GARIAHAT KOLKATA- 700029. VERSUS OIL INDIA LIMITED A PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DULIAJAN DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786602 REPRESENTED BY ITS RESIDENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER LAND (HOD) OIL INDIA LIMITED DULIAJAN DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN- 786602 Page No.# 2/3 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER LAND REQUISITION AND ACQUISITION BRANCH TINSUKIA DISTRICT ASSAM PIN-786125. 4:NATWA BHUSHAN SONOWAL SON OF SRI DHRUBA SONOWAL RESIDENT OF PENGAREE CHARIALI P.O. AND P.S.- PENGAREE DISTRICT- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125. 5:DILIP KUMAR BORA SON OF PRIJARAM BORA RESIDENT OF PENGAREE CHARIALI P.O. AND P.S.- PENGAREE DISTRICT- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125. ------------ Advocate for : MR P BHARDWAJ Advocate for : MR. S S ROY appearing for OIL INDIA LIMITED BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 31.10.2025 Heard Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel representing Mr. P. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the applicants-writ petitioners; Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel for the opposite party – respondent nos. 1 & 2; Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the opposite party – respondent no. 3; and Mr. A.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party – respondent nos. 4 & 5. The applicants as the writ petitioners have preferred the accompanying writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 420/2025. Mr. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicants-writ petitioners has submitted that the instant interlocutory application is filed seeking leave to withdraw the accompanying writ Page No.# 3/3 petition, W.P.[C] no. 420/2025. The learned counsel for the opposite parties-respondents have submitted that they have no objection to the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the applicants-writ petitioners. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Rahman, learned counsel for the applicants-writ petitioners, the instant interlocutory application seeking withdrawal of the accompanying writ petition, W.P.[C] no. 420/2025 is allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant