Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26892 (ALL)

RAMESH KUMAR SINGH ALIAS RAMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/423/2025 · 2025-03-06

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:33332 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 423 of 2025 Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Singh Alias Ramesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pratibha Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to conclude the trial of Case No. 1898 of 2018 arising out of case crime no. 452 of 2018 under Sections 379, 411, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station- Robertsganj, District- Sonbhadra pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is one of the accused persons. It is further submitted that the present case relates to the year 2018 and after submission of the charge sheet in this matter no effective proceeding has taken place and the Court has not recorded evidence of any witness so far. It is further submitted that the present applicant along with other co-accused Pravin is regularly appearing before the trial Court but the other co-accused persons were absconding and that is why vide order dated 29.4.2024 the trial of the present applicant and co-accused Pravin was separated but even then no effective proceeding has taken place so far. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of two years from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad