1 2025:CGHC:44086 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 435 of 2023 1 - Dr. Ajmer Singh Kushwah S/o Late Kevli Singh Aged About 52 Years Working As Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Veterinary Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Veterinary Services, Indravati Bhawan, Division Iii, Ground Floor, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh 4 - Dr. S. Jahiruddin Incharge Deputy Director, Veterinary Services, District Sukma Chhattisgarh 5 - The Transfer Examination Committee Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Through Its Chairman Manoj Kumar Pingua, The Chief Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/08/2025 1. This petition is preferred against orders dated 30.09.2022, 10.10.2022 and 22.12.2022. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- "10.1That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/ order, thereby setting-aside/quashing the impugned orders dated 30.09.2022 Annexure P/1, 10.10.2022 Annexure P/2 and 22.12.2022 Annexure P/15 so far it relates to the petitioner and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to continue at his present place of posting. 10.2. That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.." 3. Vide order dated 19.01.2023, the petitioner was granted stay by this Court. 4. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter and considering the fact that on the strength of the aforesaid stay order, the petitioner is still continuing at his original place of posting, as such, by the afflux of time the said orders, has lost its efficacy and 3 as such the orders dated 30.09.2022, 10.10.2022 and 22.12.2022 are required to be quashed and accordingly the said order under challenge is hereby quashed. 5. However, liberty is granted to the respondent State authorities to pass appropriate orders in respect of transfer of the petitioner, in case exigency arises, without being influenced by this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena