Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010228912025 2025:GAU-AS:14370 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3322/2025 MONU ROY ALIAS GUWALA S/O SUNIL ROY @ GUWALA R/O JHANJUPARA, PANU KAURI P.S. RAJGANJ DIST. JALPAIGURI, WEST BENGAL. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R A AHMED, MR K THAKUR,N NATH,M ISLAM,MR M AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS O R D E R 28.10.2025 Heard Mr. K. Thakur, learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent. 2. This application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Monu Roy @ Guwala, seeking regular bail in connection with Mangaldai P.S. Case No.188/2025, under Section 304(2) of BNS, 2023. The accused person was arrested on 26.09.2025. 3. The FIR dated 25.09.2025 lodged by the alleged victim alleges that after she had withdrawn Rs.50,000/- from SBI Mangaldai and about to ride on two wheeler, the accused tried to snatched her moneybag and upon her raising hue and cry, he was caught by public and another fled away. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was also custodialy examined for three days during the investigation and considering the length of detention, he seeks his bail at this stage. 5. The case diary is received. 6. The learned Addl. P.P. submits that the investigation has found materials against the accused petitioner. In the forwarding report, the accused has been stated to be belonging to West Bengal and being a part of so called Irani gang involved in habitual snatching. The eye-witnesses have supported the allegation of snatching and such witnesses have also stated about another co-accused Page No.# 3/3 running away with the bag of money, which has not yet been recovered. The police are trying to apprehend other members of the so called gang. 7. Accordingly, at this stage, I deem it fit not to grant the bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected at this stage. 8. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant