1 APHC010380682014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 32683/2014 Between: Sri Ramireddy Prathap Kumar Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PONAVOLU SUDHAKARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B D MAHESWARA REDDY 2. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 3. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “.... to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in convening the General Body meeting of the Kavali Municipality, SPSR Nellore on 31.08.2014 being Public Holiday and when Budget Session-2014 of the Assembly is in session and passing resolutions as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 and G.O.Ms.No.769/E/E4/82 dated 02.11.1982 and G.O.Ms.No.250/90/M.A dated 03.04.1990 issued by the government and consequently declare the same as illegal and set aside the resolutions passed in the meeting…...” 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that no cause survives in this Writ Petition. 3. Recording the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA KGR