Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2688 (CHH)

KRISHNA KISHORE PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/267/2025 · 2025-01-23

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:4165-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 267 of 2025 1. Krishna Kishore Patel S/o Shri Ramkishore Patel Aged About 27 Years Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Ward No./7, Keshwahi, Village Padariya, District- Shahdol (M.P.) 2. Arun Kumar Chandra S/o Shri Babu Lal Chandra Aged About 27 Years Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Village Achritpali, Tehsil Malkharouda District Sakti C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, P.S. Gourela, District Gaurela-Pendra Marwahi (Cg) ...Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 23 . 01 .202 5 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioners when the case is called out. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.01.23 18:29:02 +0530 2 2. Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the respondent/State, is present. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “i. That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quashing/set aside the impugned FIR vide crime No. 297 of 2024 on 02.09.2024 registered at P.S. Gourela, District Gaurela-Pendra Marwahi (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 4. After having perused the impugned FIR, we find that the FIR has been lodged against the 10 accused persons and the petitioners are not named in the FIR and their name has come in the light of confessional statement of the co-accused, hence, they have sought for quashing of the FIR. But, after going through the same, it transpires that the matter is still under investigation and prima facie, the involvement of the petitioners has been found. 5. In view of the above, we are not inclined to interfere in the present petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan