Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26879 (JHR)

RIJHO MAHTO ALIAS RIJHO YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/916/2024 · 2025-01-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 916 of 2024 ------ 1. Rijho Mahto @ Rijho Yadav, aged about 83 years, son of Late Punit Mahato @ Late Punit Yadav, resident of Village Belhara Gurio, P.O. –Barhi, P.S. –Barhi, District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 2. Ashok Mahto @ Ashok Yadav, aged about 37 years, son of Rijho Mahto @ Rijho Yadav, resident of village Belhara Gurio, P.O. –Barhi and P.S. Barhi, District –Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 3. Meghlal Yadav, aged about 61 years, son of Jivan Yadav, resident of Village Belhara Gurio, P.O. –Barhi, P.S. Barhi, District –Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 4. Mahesh Yadav, aged about 43 years, son of Rameshwar Yadav, resident of Village Belhara Gurio, P.O. –Barhi, P.S. Barhi, District –Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 5. Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar Yadav, aged about 26 years, son of Chandradev Yadav @ Ramchandra Yadav, resident of Village Belhara Gurio, P.O. –Barhi, P.S. Barhi, District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, P.O. Hazaribagh, P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh. 3. The Divisional Forest Officer, Hazaribagh, West Forest Division, P.O. –Hazaribagh, P.S. –Hazaribagh, District – Hazaribagh. 4. The Forest Range Officer, Barhi, P.O. Barhi, P.S. Barhi, District –Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. 5. The Forest Guard, Barhi, P.O. Barhi, P.S. Barhi, District Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shishir Sumah, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Manoj Kumar , G.A.-III : Mr. Deepankar, AC to G.A.-III ------ Order No.05 Dated- 27.01.2025 Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to raise all the grounds mentioned in the petition before the appropriate court at appropriate stage. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. In view of disposal of this writ petition, the interim relief granted earlier vide order dated 26.11.2024 is vacated. Registry is directed to intimate the court concerned forthwith. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/