- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19939 WP NO.14691 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14691 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. LAXMI W/O SHIVA D/O DYAVEGOWDA @ THAMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST AND HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/AT HUNASETHOPPALU, BOODITHITTU VILLAGE, HARANAHALLI HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA B. HARAVI GOWDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002. 2. THE TAHASILDAR PERIYAPATNA TALUK, PERIYAPATNA, MYSURU DISTRICT - 560 002. 3. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CHAPPRADAHALLI GRAMA PANCYAHATH PERIYAPTNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19939 WP NO.14691 OF 2025 4. THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR BETTADAPURA POLICE STATION PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDR ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 02ND MAY, 2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-X; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25TH APRIL, 2025 VIDE ANEXURE-X1; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for direction for consideration of representation dated 02nd May, 2025 (Annexure-X) by the respondent No.2 and representation dated 25th April, 2025 (Annexure-X1) by the respondent No.3. 3. Heard Sri. Hanumanthappa B. Haravi Gowdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Siddharth - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19939 WP NO.14691 OF 2025 Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents. 4. It is contended by Sri. Hanumanthappa B. Haravi Gowdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that, one Dharma @ Karigowda bin late Hanuma and others in the village are obstructing the petitioner to cultivate the land in question and also those persons are threatening the petitioner and therefore, he submitted that, the direction be issued to the respondent No.2-Tahsildar to consider the issue. 5. Per contra, Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents submit that the aforesaid representations filed by the petitioner cannot be considered by the respondent No.2- Tahsildar, Periyapatna Taluk. Accordingly, he sought for dismissal of the writ petition. 6. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful examination of the averments made in the writ petition, I am of the view that the petitioner has a remedy before the other competent authorities by making necessary complaint/representation for redressal of his - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19939 WP NO.14691 OF 2025 grievance and the respondent-Tahsildar, Periyapatna is nothing to do with the relief sought for by the petitioner as per representations dated 02nd May, 2025 (Annexure-X) and 25th April, 2025 (Annexure-X1). With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34