Rahul Negi and others versus State of H.P. and others CMP(M) No.2047 of 2024 Item No.D-7 13.03.2025 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 4-State. CMP(M) No.2047 of 2024 Notice. Mr. Arsh Rattan, Learned Deputy Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 and states that no reply is required to be filed on behalf of non- applicants/respondents No. 1 to 4 to the present application for condonation of delay. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, we are of the opinion that sufficient cause has been made out to condone the delay. Therefore, the delay of 102 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Appeal be registered. LPA No. 96 of 2025 Notice in the aforesaid terms. In view of the arguments raised, the matter requires consideration. Admit. (G. S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice 13th March, 2025 (Ranjan Sharma) (himani/Bhardwaj) Judge