[2025:RJ-JP:32327] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10012/2025 Abhishek Kumar S/o Shri Satyendra Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dhanawa, Police Station Parwalpur, District Nalanda, Bihar. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Naveen Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 19/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.181/2024 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Gangapur City for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 340(2), 336(3), 338 & 61(2)(a) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He submits that dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and there are no criminal antecedents against him. Trial of the case will take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:32327] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10012/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, learned counsel for complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably & alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Abhishek Kumar S/o Shri Satyendra Kumar shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /282