ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER v. M/S ATIKUR REHMAN ABDUL GAFUR
WRES/171/2023 · 2025-03-10
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26871 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26871 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:10802] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 171/2023 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8365/2015 Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nidhi Bhawan, Sub Regional Office, Vigyan Nagar, Kota (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus M/s Atikur Rehman Abdul Gafur, Piplheri, Suket, Tehsil - Ramganj Mandi, District Kota. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Karan Verma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 10/03/2025
1. Instant restoration application has been filed by petitioner, seeking restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8365/2015, which came to be dismissed in default vide order dated 19.01.2023.
2. Taking into consideration the reasons mentioned in the application, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the instant application, subject to deposition of cost.
3. Accordingly, the instant restoration application is allowed and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8365/2015 is allowed to be restored to its original number, subject to condition of deposition of a cost of Rs.1,000/- with the Litigants Welfare Fund through Banker's Cheque/ Demand Draft in the name of Registrar General LWFA, Rajasthan High Court within a period of four weeks. Receipt of deposition of cost amount be placed in the file.
[2025:RJ-JP:10802] (2 of 2) [WRES-171/2023]
4. However, in case of non-deposition of cost amount within the stipulated time period, as directed hereinabove, the restoration application be treated as dismissed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /37