1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.17 of 2025 Date of decision: 05.09.2025 Joginder Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ..Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Prem P. Chauhan, Advocate (through VC) with Ms. Shikha Rajta & Ms. Urvashi Rajta, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Joginder Kumar & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Anr.1 was disposed of with directions to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of State of H.P. & Ors. vs. Sardari Lal & Anr.2 and to pass appropriate order within a period of six weeks. 2. Pursuant to the above, the respondents have issued an office order dated 05.08.2024, in which the name of the petitioner appears at Serial No.5. The petitioner’s grievance is that, though the respondents have passed the 1 CWP No.6096 of 2023 decided on 06.09.2023 along with connected matters. 2 CWP No.842 of 2017 decided on 07.07.2022 along with connected matters. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes consideration order, he is entitled to benefits greater than those granted therein. If that is the petitioner’s grievance, it is for him to challenge the consideration order to the extent of such grievance in accordance with law by availing the appropriate remedy. 3. With the above observation, the present execution petition is disposed of. Petitioner is, however, at liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, including against the consideration. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 5th September, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)