Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010257152025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3909/2025 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, G.S. ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER, GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI -781007 VERSUS JAHERA KHATUN AND 3 ORS. W/O JAKIR HUSSAIN, 2:JAKIR HUSSAIN S/O ABUL HUSSAIN BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KATIMARI GRANT P.O. - HAIBORGAON P.S. - NAGAON DISTRICT - NAGAON ASSAM. PIN -782002 (OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 2 IS REPRESENTED BY OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 1.) 3:LUKMAN HAKIM S/O JABAN ALI R/O VILLAGE - KARAYGURI P.O. - PUB SALMARA P.S. - RUPOHI DISTRICT - NAGAON ASSAM. PIN -782142 4:MD. SAFIQUL ISLAM S/O SAHUR UDDIN R/O VILLAGE - RAMPUR SALAPUR Page No.# 2/3 P.O. - KADOMONI P.S. - BATADRAVA DISTRICT - NAGAON ASSAM. PIN -78212 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P SHARMA, MS. C MOZUMDAR,MS. R D MOZUMDAR Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : MAC App./14791/2025 (Filing Number) ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI G.S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE ULUBARI GUWAHATI -781007 VERSUS JAHERA KHATUN W/O JAKIR HUSSAIN 2:JAKIR HUSSAIN S/O ABUL HUSSAIN BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KATIMARI GRANT P.O. - HAIBORGAON P.S. - NAGAON DISTRICT - NAGAON ASSAM. PIN -782002 OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 2 IS REPRESENTED BY OPPOSITE PARTY NO. 1. 3:LUKMAN HAKIM (OWNER) S/O JABAN ALI R/O VILLAGE - KARAYGURI P.O. - PUB SALMARA P.S. - RUPOHI DISTRICT - NAGAON ASSAM. PIN -782142 4:MD SAFIQUL ISLAM S/O SAHUR UDDIN Page No.# 3/3 R/O VILLAGE - RAMPUR SALAPUR P.O. - KADOMONI P.S. - BATADRAVA DISTRICT - NAGAON ASSAM. PIN -782122 ------------ Advocate for : Samujjal Pratim Sharma Advocate for : appearing for JAHERA KHATUN BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 03.12.2025 Heard Mrs. R.D. Mozumdar, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the applicant. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 40 days of delay in filing the connected MAC Appeal. 3. This Court has gone through the application and found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. 4. This Court is of the opinion that at this stage, going for issuing notice to the respondents would not serve any purpose. 5. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. 6. The connected MAC Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant