Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010243102025 2025:GAU-AS:15158 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2627/2025 SAHIDUR RAHMAN LASKAR SON OF ABDUL SUKKUR LASKAR, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KAROIKANDI PART-II, P.S KATIGORAH, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM. PIN-788805 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D HUSSAIN, MR M ISLAM,MR. R A MAZUMDER,MD E AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : SPECIAL PP, VIGILANCE, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 10.11.2025 1. Heard Mr. D. Hussain, the learned counsel for the accused/applicant. Also heard Mr. P. P. Dutta, the learned Additional Special Public Prosecutor, CM Vigilance Cell, Assam. Page No.# 2/3 2. This petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the accused/applicant, namely, Sahidur Rahman Laskar has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 01/2024, under Sections 120(B)/420/468/471 /406/409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 13 (1)(a)/13(2) of the P.C. Act, 1988. 3. The gist of accusation against the accused/applicant is mainly with regard to preparation of final bill of the contract involved in the execution of PMGSY Package No. AS-13-261, pertaining to construction of “Anipur NUC road at Harinagar to PuboBaruala”, along with construction of two numbers of RCC bridges, in which bills were passed in payment. 4. The Case diary, as called for, is placed before the Court. 5. It may be mentioned that by order, dated 07.11.2025, this Court granted the privilege of interim pre-arrest bail to the accused/applicant subject to conditions. 6. Mr. K. K. Parasar, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, submits that the case diary shows that the accused/applicant appeared before the investigating officer and got his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. in terms of the interim pre-arrest bail granted earlier. This Court finds that custodial interrogation of the accused/applicant may not be necessary in the interest of the ongoing investigation into the case. 7. Accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 07.11.2025 is hereby made absolute, subject said conditions. 8. Return the case diary. Page No.# 3/3 9. This disposes off the anticipatory bail application. JUDGE Comparing Assistant