Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26868 (KAR)

KENCHAPPA AND SON'S v. M J GUPTA

CRL.RP/848/2016 · 2025-06-25

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22145 CRL.RP No. 848 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 848 OF 2016 BETWEEN: KENCHAPPA AND SONS A PROPRIETARY CONCERN, AT NO.82, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, BEML LAYOUT, BSAAVESHWARA NAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 079. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, LINGARAJU K. S/O. LATE KENCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR S., ADVOCATE) AND: M J GUPTA S/O.LATE ANJAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT C/O. SIDDAMMA, NO.939, RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK, BSK 3RD STAGE, SRINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 050. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.C. MAHESHA, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.R.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF THE LEARNED LI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND S.J., BANGALORE CITY (CCH-52) IN CRL.A.NO.122/2014 DATED 13.04.2016 SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22145 CRL.RP No. 848 of 2016 CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE LEARNED XIII ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.11140/2009 DATED 04.02.2014 AND ETC. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed memo for retirement. Postal receipt has been affixed to the said memo for retirement. Copy of the notice and postal acknowledgment are not filed along with the memo for retirement. 2. NBW issued against the petitioner has returned with shara “addressee vacated the address 15 years ago and whereabouts are not known”. There is no any other address to reissue the NBW against the petitioner. 3. Considering the said aspect, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this revision petition. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12