Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.3070 of 2025
Decided on: 8th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Raman Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 6. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioner has instituted this writ petition against the order passed by the Additional District Magistrate-cum-Appellate Authority (under Part Time Multi Task Worker Scheme 2020), District Sirmour on
22.03.2024. In terms of the aforesaid order, petitioner’s appeal was dismissed.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that in terms of Clause 19 added in the Part Time Multi Task Worker Policy, 2020 vide addendum to the policy issued on 25.08.2022, petitioner has right of appeal against the
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 aforesaid order to the Director of Higher/Elementary Education, which the petitioner has not exercised before instituting this writ petition. Learned counsel, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy provided to the petitioner in accordance with law.
Granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. The time period spent in pursuing this writ petition will not be computed for the purpose of limitation.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 08, 2025
Judge Mukesh