SRI NAYANJYOTI RAJKHOWA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
Bail Appln./3669/2025 · 2025-11-13
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26856 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26856 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010248892025
2025:GAU-AS:15425
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3669/2025 SRI NAYANJYOTI RAJKHOWA S/O. LATE TARUN RAJKHOWA R/O. VILL P.O- BALIJAN P.S.- GOHPUR,DIST- BISWANATH ASSAM, PIN-784172 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R P HAZARIKA, MR. A RAJKHOWA,AMIR HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 14.11.2025 Heard Mr. Rajkhowa, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. This is an application under 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for bail to the
Page No.# 2/3 accused, namely; Sri Nayanjyoti Rajkhowa in connection with Dhakuakhana Police Station Case No. 73/2025 in (G.R Case No. 104/2025) under Section 318(2)/69 BNS. 3. Brief facts of the case is that the informant lady had been known to the petitioner since September, 2023 and they entered into a romantic relationship in course of which the petitioner fraudulently obtained money from the mother of the informant, amounting to Rs. 6,69,000/- apparently to get some work of the complainant done. Later his attitude gradually changed and he started torturing and abusing her, and also made false promises to marry her. It is further alleged in the charge-sheet that the petitioner had sexual intercourse with the informant several times by using deceitful means. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he had already deposited the money taken from the account of the informant. 5. It appears that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has been detained since 19th September, 2025 and therefore, has already spent around 55 days in custody. 6. Considering the length of the detention, the fact that investigation is over, as well as the nature of the allegation, further custodial detention of the petitioner is not necessary. 7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. It is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.
50,000/- only, with two sureties of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhakuakhana, Assam, subject to the following condition:
Page No.# 3/3 (1) That the accused petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any police officer. 8. The bail application stands disposed of accordingly. 9. Send back the CD. JUDGE Comparing Assistant