206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-18121-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 Baljinder Singh and Another ...Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- None for the petitioners. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of Advertisement No.2 of 2001 to the extent it does not provide age relaxation. The Advertisement was in 2001. A period of 24 years has passed away. 2. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab submits that issue stands settled in favour of the State by judgment dated 06.09.2001 in CWP-10947-2001 titled as ‘Bikram Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others’ passed by Division Bench of this Court. 3. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. The petitioners are at liberty to move an appropriate PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.16 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-18121-2001 (O&M) -2- application within three months from today, if cause survives. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.07.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.16 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document