Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010278212025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7259/2025 THE STATE BANK OF INDIA A STATUTORY BODY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA ACT, 1955, HAVING ITS CORPORATE CENTRE AT STATE BANK BHAVAN, MADAME CAMA ROAD, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA MUMBAI, REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, PREMISES AND ESTATE , LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, SBI GUWAHATI FLAT NO. 2C, SUBHAM RESIDENCY, HENGRABARI, GUWAHATI 781006 VERSUS SRI AMITAVA ROY S/O. SRI BIMAL CHANDRA ROY, LOKNATH GUEST HOUSE, 130/1 MOTOR STAND ROAD AGARTALA, TRIPURAWEST, PIN 799001. 2:SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD M.V. ROAD WESTERN EXPRESS HIGHWAY JUNCTION ANDHERI EAST MUMBAI - 400 06 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H BURAGOHAIN, H. BORUAH Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 17.12.2025 Heard Shri H. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioner, who is aggrieved by a direction by the Central Information Commission (CIC) directing for providing certain information under the Right to Information act. This Court has however noted that the Commission which is the decision making authority has not been made a party respondent. In a writ proceeding, since the decision making process is the subject matter, the authority making the impugned decision is required to be arrayed as a party respondent. At this stage, Shri Buragohain, the learned counsel for the petitioner prays for allowing him to withdraw this petition with a liberty to present it afresh in an appropriate manner. The petition is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant