Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26848 (DEL)

PIYUSH ROHIT WASON & ORS. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./5377/2025 · 2025-09-03

Girish Kathpalia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.M.C. 5377/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages $~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 03.09.2025 + CRL.M.C. 5377/2025 PIYUSH ROHIT WASON & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nalin Tripathi and Mr. Shivansh Pandey, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with IO/Insp. Adith Lily and SI Vijay Pal, PS CWC, Nanakpura R-2 (through videoconferencing) CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 07/2021 of PS CWC, Nanakpura for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has settled the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Detailed statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. 3. Respondent no. 2 is present through videoconferencing and is identified by IO/Insp. Adith Lily. 4. I have spoken with respondent no. 2 and she states that she has GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965f f801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.03 17:48:50 -07'00' CRL.M.C. 5377/2025 Page 2 of 2 pages compromised all disputes with the petitioners amicably. It is further informed by her that marriage between her and petitioner no. 1 already stands dissolved by way of a decree of divorce. It is submitted by her that they had a child, who has unfortunately passed away and now she wants to settle down in peace so she has opted to close all litigations. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has received full and final settlement amount in lieu of her stridhan and alimony. Respondent no. 2 submits that she does not wish to pursue prosecution of petitioners. 5. In view of the aforesaid, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through trial. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 07/2021 of PS CWC, Nanakpura for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 03, 2025 ‘rs’ GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.03 17:48:34 -07'00'