UMAKANT AND 14 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/4547/2025 · 2025-03-10
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35151-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4547 of 2025 Petitioner :- Umakant And 14 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Indrajeet Kumar Shukla,Kaushal Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mohan Lal Pandey,Sheetala Prasad Pandey Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Sheetala Prasad Pandey, learned counsel for the informant.
2. Prayer made in the writ petition to quash the First Information Report 06.02.2025 registered as Case crime No.0063 of 2025, under sections 115(2), 191(2), 324(4), 333, 351(2), 352 of B.N.S., Police Station- Badlapur, District Jaunpur, need not be examined on merits in view of the statement made by learned A.G.A. that investigation has already concluded in the matter with submission of charge-sheet on 18.02.2025. The chargesheet is otherwise not under challenge.
3. Confronted with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners do not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, in case the petitioners are aggrieved, they may avail the remedy as available in law. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 11.3.2025 NLY Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad