Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010251972025 2025:GAU-AS:17734 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2695/2025 SRI SUBHODEEP DUTTA AND 5 ORS. SON OF SRI MANNA DUTTA RESIDENT OF- - RAJ CHANDRA DAS ROAD, P.S.- KARIMGANJ, DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI, ASSAM. 2: SRI MANNA DUTTA SON OF LATE KRISHNA PADA DUTTA RESIDENT OF- - RAJ CHANDRA DAS ROAD P.S.- KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM. 3: SMTI SHILPI DUTTA WIFE OF SRI MANNA DUTTA RESIDENT OF- - RAJ CHANDRA DAS ROAD P.S.- KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM. 4: SRI MONODEEP DUTTA SON OF MANNA DUTTA RESIDENT OF- - RAJ CHANDRA DAS ROAD P.S.- KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI ASSAM. 5: SMTI PRIYANKA MAZUMDAR W/O- SANTOSH YADAV RESIDENT OF- NILMONI ROAD NEAR MOU ICE-CREAM FACTORY OPPOSITE JUNIOR SCIENCE COLLEGE P.O. AND P.S.- KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- - SRIBHUMI 6: MANISHANKAR DHAR S/O- LATE MIHIR DHAR RESIDENT OF- GACHKALIBARI ROAD P.S.- KARIMGANJ DISTRICT- SRIBHUMI Page No.# 2/2 VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T J MAHANTA, MR. P P DUTTA,MS. P P DAS,MS P SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 16.12.2025 Heard Mr T J Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms P Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. 2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the order of this Court dated 14.11.2025, the petitioners have appeared before the investigating authorities and their statements have been recorded. It has been further stated that there is another case for judicial separation, which was filed by the petitioner No. 1 and upon receipt of the aforesaid notice, the present FIR had been lodged. 3. Since the petitioners have appeared before the investigating authorities and their statements have been recorded, this Court does not deem it necessary that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required henceforth. 4. In such view of the matter, the privilege of bail granted to the petitioners on 14.11.2025, is hereby made absolute. 5. Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant