Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2684 (CHH)

KOMAL SINGH THAKUR v. CHHATTISGARH STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY

WPS/134/2025 · 2025-03-06

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:11059 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 134 of 2025 1 - Komal Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Amar Singh Thakur Aged About 63 Years Previously Posted As District Legal Aid Officer Dhamtari / Mahasamund R/o A- 5 Minocha Colony Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority Legal Services Authority Through Its Chairman Old High Court Building Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Membar Secretary Chhattisgarh State Legal Services Authority Old High Court Building Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - President District - Legal Services Authority Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. 4 - Enquiry Officer District Judge / President District - Legal Services Authority Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aniruddh Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/03/2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records in relation to the case of the petitioner from the possession of respondents for its kind perusal. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may further kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to decide the appeal filed by the Petitioner within a period of four weeks. 10.3 This Hon'ble Court may also kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to provide financial assessment from date of retirement and grant all the consequential benefits which were not granted to him till date. 10.4 That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant such other relief(s) in favour of the petitioner, as it may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. 10.5 Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner.” 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition his representation has been decided and, therefore, he is seeking time either to amend the petition and to place the documents or to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdraw, with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat