Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2684 (BOM)

VIRBHADRA SHIVPUTRA TAMBULE THR. POWER OF ATTORNEY ANNARAO S. TAMBULE AND ANR v. SUREKHA BASAWARAJ KESARE AND ORS

WP/12446/2025 · 2026-08-19

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

56-WP-12446-2025=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12446 OF 2025 Virbhadra Shivputra Tambule Thr. Power Of Attorney Annarao S. Tambule and Anr. … Petitioners Vs. Surekha Basawaraj Kesare and Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. R.S. Alange for the Petitioners Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni a/w Raghuvendra B. Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. J.P. Patil, AGP for the Respondent – State. …………. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026. P. C. : . Heard both sides. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties are unanimous to continue interim arrangement and to direct the respondent No.4 – Sub- Divisional Officer to decide Revision Application No. 310 of 2025 within stipulated period. 3. The respondents are successful before the Tahasildar under Section 5 of the Act. Being aggrieved, Revision is preferred against the petitioners. The Interim Application for stay came to be rejected by the impugned order. This Court granted interim relief vide order dated Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2026.08.20 16:10:21 +0530 56-WP-12446-2025=.doc 05.12.2025 which is being continued further. The interim arrangement expounded by this Court shall be continued till final disposal of the Revision. The Revision shall be decided expeditiously and within four (04) months from today. 4. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. 5. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 6. The parties shall co-operate in expeditious disposal of the matter. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) Uday S. Jagtap 2 of 2